If this email does not display correctly, please use this link to view the message.

DignityUSA Logo

Breath of the Spirit

Pastoral, Liturgical, Teaching, and Social Justice Moments brought to you by DignityUSA.

Breath of the Spirit is our electronic spiritual and liturgical resource for our members and potential members. Nothing can replace your chapter or other faith community but we hope you will find further support here for integrating your spirituality with your sexuality and all the strands of your life.


Jesus’ birth not only had meaning for people 2,000 years ago, it should also have meaning for us today. If on this special day we don’t explore that significance in our own lives, we’re simply freeloading on other peoples’ experiences. 


DECEMBER 25TH, 2016: CHRISTMAS
Eucharist at Midnight

Isaiah 9:1-6
Titus 2:11-14
Luke 2:1-14

Have you ever noticed the contradictions in the two gospel narratives of Jesus’ birth? Perhaps one of the most significant disagreements revolves around where Joseph and Mary lived before their son’s birth.

In today’s Lucan pericope, they originally reside in Nazareth and temporarily end up in Bethlehem because of a return-to-hometown-census decreed by Caesar Augustus – an improbable census which no historian has yet been able to track down. After a short stay in David’s city, the three return to Nazareth where Jesus spends his childhood.

In Matthew, on the other hand, Joseph and Mary already live in Bethlehem. Their roundabout path to Nazareth is triggered by King Herod’s slaughter of children in an attempt to kill the Messiah – an atrocious action which even National Geographic claimed several years ago most probably didn’t happen. The Holy Family first flees to Egypt, then, instead of returning to Bethlehem, eventually decide to settle in Nazareth.

We’ve traditionally gotten around these contradictions by combining the two narratives into a third account which we use for our school Christmas plays and display in the crib sets under our Christmas trees. Since we’re so unfamiliar with Scripture almost no one notices this crime against divine inspiration. (I trust over the centuries that God has mercifully been shielding Matthew and Luke in heaven from this atrocity.)

Having heard these gospel birth stories all our lives, most of us believe we’re listening to historical, accurate accounts of this important event, yet we’re actually coming into contact with each evangelist’s unique theology, not unbiased history. If we only had one gospel, we might be excused if we think we’re listening to history. Thankfully we have two narrating the circumstances of Jesus’ birth. The contradictions are one proof we’re dealing with theology, not history. It’s one thing to see something happen; quite another to understand the meaning of what happened. Theology’s main goal is to convey meaning. That’s why we almost always find contradictions in biblical theology. There’s always more than one set of implications for any given event.

Like most Christians of his day and age, Luke was theologically convinced Isaiah was speaking about Jesus as Messiah when in today’s first reading he proclaimed the Messiah’s Prince of Peace “dominion” over all people. No wonder Luke calls upon angels to announce “peace to those on whom (God’s) favor rests.” If you’ve experienced such peace in your following of Jesus, then you theologically insert something about that peace in your birth narrative.

The unknown author of the letter to Titus does something similar in our second reading. Because he theologically interprets Jesus’ death and resurrection as a cleansing of ourselves from “lawlessness,” he encourages his readers to “reject godless ways and worldly desires,” until the day when the risen Jesus returns in glory. It’s important to note that as meaningful as this theology is for many Christians, it significantly differs from Luke’s theology of the same event.

Perhaps one way to avoid the “schmaltz” accompanying our modern celebrations of Christmas would be to create our own theology of Jesus’ birth. Imitating Matthew and Luke, we shouldn’t start our theologizing with Bethlehem and Nazareth, angels and shepherds, but with our own personal, unique experience of the risen Jesus in our daily lives. With what would we compare that experience? Is there anything we’ve read or seen that would help others know what happens when we daily imitate Jesus? Or even better, would help ourselves more deeply understand that experience?

Jesus’ birth not only had meaning for people 2,000 years ago, it should also have meaning for us today. If on this special day we don’t explore that significance in our own lives, we’re simply freeloading on other peoples’ experiences. 

DignityUSA

P.O. Box 376
Medford, MA 02155
United States

800-877-8797
info@dignityusa.org

Please support DignityUSA

Click here to unsubscribe from our mailing list.

Click here to stop receiving email from DignityUSA.

Forward this email