
RVC’s
Weekly Spiritual Essay
June
5, 2005: TENTH SUNDAY OF THE YEAR
Readings
Hosea
6:3-6
Romans
4:18-25
Matthew
9:9-13
Josef
Fuchs, a person who deeply influenced my life, died recently. Forty years ago he was one of my moral
professors at the Gregorian University.
His classes were automatically interesting because he taught “de
sexton:” the course on sex. Yet
his influence stretched beyond that specific topic. Fr. Fuchs often reminded us that, especially in the
confessional, we were not so much to be “answer men” as we were to be ministers
who help form and respect the consciences of others. Instead of giving erudite responses to complicated
questions, he encouraged us to listen carefully and ask appropriate questions
in order to understand and appreciate the motives behind the penitent’s
actions.
The
German Jesuit certainly mirrored the mentality of the historical Jesus. Even the most liberal Scripture
scholars – those who claim we can know almost nothing about the historical
Jesus – concede that there’s one thing about which we can be certain: he
associated with people whom the “good folk” regarded as sinners. That’s why today’s gospel pericope is
so important.
Matthew,
the evangelist, describes the call of Matthew, the sinner. Tax collectors were looked upon as
sinners both because of the way they collected taxes – by force,
blackmail and intimidation – and because of those for whom they collected
taxes – the hated Roman occupiers of Israel. Jesus deliberately calls Matthew while he’s “sinning;” he
was “sitting at the customs post.”
Jesus
surfaces something in this traitor and his sinful friends that others seem not
to notice. His only defense for
his outrageous behavior is the statement, “Those who are well do not need a physician,
but the sick do . . . I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” People who claim they’re “saved” without Jesus, shouldn’t
object to those who can only be saved through Jesus. He sets the record clear: “I did not come to call the
righteous (those already carrying out God’s will), but sinners.”
If we
need Jesus in our lives, we’re admitting we’re sinners. He didn’t come to help anyone but
sinners. Respect for these
outcasts must have been one of the deepest motivating influences in his life
and ministry. There’s no other way
to explain his oft-condemned table-fellowship with them.
Though a
practicing Jew, Paul constantly associated with Gentiles. He defined his ministry as being an
announcer of the good news to them.
These Gentile/Christians were looked upon as sinners by many of Paul’s
fellow Jewish/Christians because, after their conversion to Jesus, they didn’t
follow the laws of Moses. The
apostle addresses this problem in today’s Romans passage, reminding his readers
that the first Jews in history – Abraham and Sarah – actually lived
hundreds of years before Moses promulgated his 613 famous regulations. How were they saved if they didn’t have
rules and laws to save them? Along
with the author of Genesis, Paul believed salvation came through their faith in
Yahweh; a faith which parallels the faith of those non-Jews who carry out God’s
will by imitating Jesus. After
all, it was this God who “. . . raised Jesus our Lord from the dead,” not Moses.
In spite
of his openness, we presume Jesus, like Amos, often dealt with people who
weren’t sincere about their relationship with God; those who pray, “Let us
strive to know Yahweh,” yet whose “piety is like a morning cloud, like the dew
that early passes away.” Such
people are quick to offer sacrifice but slow to develop their love and mercy
relationships with others. Jesus,
Paul and Amos taught that an experience (knowledge) of God should be the goal
of every disciple of God, not an experience of rituals and institutions. All three knew what to look for in
people, even sinners.
No doubt sinners who encountered Josef Fuchs in the confessional encountered someone who had as much confidence in and respect for them as the historical Jesus had in and for those sinners he encountered.